Sunday, October 3, 2010

Blinded by Headlines: What Lays Underneath by Blair

As a typical 21st century teenager, I rely on the Internet as a primary source for information on news regarding the outside world. Not only are we dependent on technology, but we also rely on celebrity magazines in order to stay current on all the hot celebrity gossip and national news. According to many, they rely on these magazines in order to stay “in the know.” Can these magazines be considered a staple of American culture? I may not an expert on all these magazines, but I consider People Magazine to be by far the most popular. As a subscriber to this magazine, I have learned how to read and examine its data and in my personal opinion, I believe it is the most reliable.

While investigating this topic, the constant thought that ran through my mind was “how exactly IS a news source deemed reliable?” Although I could not find an answer to that question, I decided to try and figure out the answer on my own. Many times when I peruse the magazine shelves at the grocery store, my attention is immediately caught by the numerous headlines such as “Angelina Can’t Take Brad Anymore,” “Obama Reaches a Breaking Point,” and, “He Cheated on Me.” In fact, it is hard for me to trust these magazines simply because the headlines are so extreme. This makes me wonder where exactly do magazines get their data. I know the majority of People’s data is from interviews, but what about other magazines such as Star and OK?

I chose to examine other teenager’s perspectives on celebrity magazines by creating a survey. Out of 100 responses from high school girls from my school, 52% said they most enjoyed reading People, 10% preferred US Weekly, and 1% favored either Star, InTouch, or OK! Then there were 35% of girls who did not read any of these magazines. Then, when asked which magazine was the most reliable, 54% said People, 4% said US Weekly, 2% said InTouch, none said Star or OK!, and 40% did not know. Like me, most students preferred reading People Magazine and believed that it was the most reliable. Why is this? My theory is that it is because People’s headlines are not overly dramatic. They do not merely focus on celebrity gossip but instead choose to provide information on current events as well as celebrity’s personal lives consisting of more than just who their next lover is. While it may feel as if reading a magazine is like taking a birds eye view into a reality TV show, it is important to watch what you read. Do you really want to spend your $4.99 on magazine that has the most extravagant headline or the one with the most reliable information? Think about that.

8 comments:

  1. Hey Blair,
    Great investigation. If I read a magazine, I only choose People, but I never thought about why that was. I even got a package a couple days ago with People, Star, and OK! and I completely disregarded star and ok. I think the headlines were definitely one reason for this choice. I am wondering if this is true for other types of magazines, not just gossip rags?

    -Adela

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't read any magazines, but if I had to pick one i would probably pick people because I hear that is the most reliable. You ask a lot of good questions and investigate them. I wish I could of heard more of your opinion on why People is the best. The survey you took was a really good idea and it showed that most people trust People.

    Amelia

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Blair,

    I agree with Adela. Usually, if I am looking for a celebrity gossip magazine, my eye gravitates to People. The headlines always draws me in because of their bold statements, but also because of the celebrities that they are advertising. Is it also about the people they choose to advertise or just because of their bold headlines?

    -Deema

    ReplyDelete
  4. Blair, I think you make your article stronger by providing the data. Also, I totally agree that we shouldn't just believe everything that magazine says. And I'm one of those who never believe magazines. - Caelyn K

    ReplyDelete
  5. Blair,
    Good commentary on how we are too quick to believe all these big, all-caps headlines that are shoved in our faces constantly everywhere we go. I think to make it a little stronger, you should provide some details and data in your article. But overall, good job!

    -Christian

    ReplyDelete
  6. I didn't used to think that people who read celebrity gossip were that invested in reliability of their news (e.g., lots of my friends are Perez Hilton readers, I don't see many credible citations on that site...!), just that they wanted to stay plugged in on the latest "gossip." And isn't that the thing with "gossip" - that it is inherently unreliable?

    At the same time, People magazine is run by Time, Inc, which the masses tend to rate highly in reliability, at least according to my quick google search. You're right, the reliability of People in particular was hard to find online (I even went on the Wikipedia entry and didn't find any critical reviews).

    I did find this though: http://www.mondotimes.com/2/topics/5/entertainment/86/4344
    which rated People magazine as one of its least reliable magazines. Why do you think this is? Could be saying a lot about the readership of MondoTimes (although your survey says a lot about the specific demographic of your survey-takers too, not necessarily about the general public). I am super-impressed though that you got 100 survey responses in such a short amount of time! Wow, Internet!

    Who are the majority of readers of People, and how invested do you think they really are in "reliability" of their news? What would you do if you found out that everything you read in people was false, and that "personality journalism" (a field in which People magazine is the leader, look this up on wikipedia) was far more constructed than you imagined?

    I would have liked to know more specifics about what others were saying on the topic, so I did my own google search, and want to know what you think about this article:
    http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117946434.html?categoryid=18&cs=1&s=h&p=0
    Specifically, that People reporters have been found to dish out HUGE sums of money to post celebrity photos. What is this saying about the magazine? And what is "reliability" in this context then anyway - does paying huge sums of money for certain photos raise more questions to you about reliability? And what about in the age of photoshop?! I think all of these questions apply to media in general, all magazines and newspapers - now you've REALLY got me thinking...

    -Steph

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thorough analysis. It does make one wonder whether we humans enjoy vicariously living the celebrity life to the point where truth is less important than the thrill of feeling like an insider.

    Debra

    ReplyDelete
  8. The insightful perspectives provided by your classmates provided a broader point of view on individual choices.

    LSJ

    ReplyDelete